You are, like, so wrong. Because Rosenkrantz and Guildenstern are Dead could be regarded as fanfiction, therefore all fanfiction is that good. And you didn't write Rosenkrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, so therefore logically you can't complain about me talking about my 'l33t++ PotterSue being a waste of valuable seconds of your life and attention, because unless you can write like Shakespeare (and just wait till you see my contorted claim that Shakespeare could be construed as fanfic) or Tom Stoppard writing Shakespeare you obviously can't tell whether a field is largely shit and stinks. Whereas I WRITE FANFIC, so I can. And I read about someone who wrote fanfiction and got a job on the show's writing team! Where they write fanfiction, only for money. And if you're really good, you can be Kevin J. Anderson and do novelisations of L. Ron Hubbard. And anyway, being a good writer has nothing to do with the hard work of establishing your own characterisation rather than leaving half the effort to ride on reader assumptions. And you must be some sort of elitist. So I'm going to SCREAM AND SCREAM ABOUT HOW GOOD MY FANFIC IS UNTIL I TURN BLUE. And I'm not a whiny little shit with no creativity. How dare you.
http://www.revolutionsf.com/article.html?i
Some things are written to be read. Some are only written to be written. Best not confuse the two.
"That's not writing, that's typing" - Norman Mailer.
Update: Okay, it was Truman Capote, not Mailer. Bugger.
February 6 2004, 12:49:55 UTC 8 years ago
Huzzah!
February 6 2004, 12:54:06 UTC 8 years ago
Re:
You are obviously small minded and mean and just want to DESTROY THE CREATIVITY of the uncreative.8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
February 6 2004, 12:57:28 UTC 8 years ago
February 6 2004, 13:00:12 UTC 8 years ago
February 6 2004, 19:34:26 UTC 8 years ago
Re:
Clearly, what we have here is a failure to communicate. Let me spell it out for you a little more obviously:Posts to
February 6 2004, 13:30:19 UTC 8 years ago
And when I write fanfic, I write it for myself. But I know I've friends who like the way I write, so sometimes I share it with them. I don't write it so other people can read it - I don't really write anything so other people can read it, unless someone asks for something specific.
And I'm not a whiny little shit with no creativity. 'm not 'm not 'm not. :)
E.
x
February 6 2004, 14:02:19 UTC 8 years ago
Re:
i don't think it was aimed at you, hunny :)(ps - send your fic to me! kthx)
February 6 2004, 14:53:00 UTC 8 years ago
E.
x
8 years ago
8 years ago
February 6 2004, 14:09:42 UTC 8 years ago
Re:
Andro's right, Lothie's wasn't aimed at you, and here's why:... because I know the inside of my own head - that appreciably similar levels of creativity go into my fanfic as go into my original writing.
You write stuff that isn't fanfic, therefore you are a writer. And you know that it's not quite the same - as you said, it's 'appreciably similar' - which is not identical, whereas someone whose entire 'writing' 'career' consists of a batch of hacked-together Britney Spears fantasies would have NO IDEA what goes into REAL writing.
And yes, before anyone decides to ask, yes, I do write. Short stories, suspense and horror, mainly. Not published yet, but I haven't tried.
February 6 2004, 14:50:18 UTC 8 years ago
Or something.
E.
x
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
February 6 2004, 15:23:34 UTC 8 years ago
Re:
I know you're not :-)Fanfic is a folk form. Its purpose is to be created for an audience of other creators of the same stuff. There's nothing intrinsically wrong with stuff that's written to be written, but the existence of Rosenkrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead (and that's always the example given) does not make fanfic in general more than training wheels.
I want better flames on this post, dammit. I'm trying to shape it into something for my own journal, whose readership includes published writers of the original-characterisation sort. Which is apparently a subgenre of fanfic, according to the post four posts before this one.
February 6 2004, 15:50:42 UTC 8 years ago
While I understand your incredulity, I can't help feeling the same way about a ton of my original writing. I don't struggle to come up with these ideas - they just appear in my head, usually fully-formed. It always feels practically the same as fanfic, except that with fanfic I can at least know who to thank for having brought the matter to my attention.
E.
x
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
February 6 2004, 16:39:52 UTC 8 years ago
February 6 2004, 16:47:09 UTC 8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
February 6 2004, 16:53:58 UTC 8 years ago
Re:
BECAUSE JK ROWLING CREATED THE UNIVERSE. Jesus monkey Christ, haven't you been fucking paying attention? No gold star for you. Ok, recap:. JK Rowling created the concept of Hogwarts, house elves, wizards in the sense that they exist in her universe, etc etc etc.
. This AJ Hall pissant tapes a new name onto a derivative character and although it's (apparently) good fanfic, IT'S STILL FUCKING FANFIC.
Did this AJ Hall pissant create the universe? NO. Dd they create the school, the house elves, etc? NO.
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
February 6 2004, 16:59:10 UTC 8 years ago
February 6 2004, 17:09:37 UTC 8 years ago
Re:
YUO ARE ATTEMTPING TO DESTROTY CRETIVITY!!!!!11!!!!!"!8 years ago
8 years ago
February 6 2004, 17:26:50 UTC 8 years ago
Oh. Wait. We're the same gender. And I just had a hysterectomy. But you get the point. :)
February 6 2004, 17:33:35 UTC 8 years ago
February 6 2004, 17:53:57 UTC 8 years ago
8 years ago
8 years ago
February 6 2004, 20:20:29 UTC 8 years ago
February 6 2004, 20:57:16 UTC 8 years ago
Re:
Three saucers of cream and a catnip mousie.February 6 2004, 23:19:05 UTC 8 years ago
Re:
Seconded.February 7 2004, 00:18:55 UTC 8 years ago
Sorry, I think you're looking for
Points off for lack of style, lack of brevity, use of caps, use of 3++3 (badly, no less), and improper attribution of your quotes.
No cat, thank you, please play again later.
February 8 2004, 19:01:35 UTC 8 years ago
It's Rosencrantz.
Misassigned quotes, poorly constructed sentences; you could never cut it as a fanfiction writer. Can't even spell the fucking character names right.